The Deliberation on Reader Commentary by Portuguese Online Newspaper Readers

Authors

  • Francisco Fontes CEIS20

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31211/interacoes.n39.2020.a6

Keywords:

deliberation, online news commentary, José Sócrates, JN, Observador

Abstract

Starting with the deliberative democracy model, and the approach by some of its authors, this article aims to analyze the discourse developed in commentary sections of news on Portuguese online media. 
If technology favors democratic participation, in what way can the communication done through it obey the requirements for the deliberation to have the necessary conditions to develop in the virtual public sphere? 
Forums created by online newspapers are potential deliberation spaces. They give participants the opportunity to freely communicate and discuss ideas on a particular topic. 
This paper presents a case study on online deliberation, analyzing the commentary on news on José Sócrates' disaffiliation from the Portuguese Socialist Party, published on the online outlets of Jornal de Notícias and Observador.
In conclusion, the commentary sections tend not to comply with the normative requirements of the public sphere. Although they present the common constraints of online public conversation, they still manage to develop democratic interaction. With the host newspapers taking a closer look on the commentary sections, their potential for debating relevant topics in the public sphere could be improved.

References

Carrapatoso, M. S. (4 de maio de 2018). O “embaraço” de Sócrates com o PS. O texto do “animal feroz” nas entrelinhas. Observador.pt. Obtido em 25 de setembro de 2020, de https://observador.pt/2018/05/04/o-embaraco-de-socrates-com-o-ps-a-carta-do-animal-feroz-nas-entrelinhas/

Castells, M. (2003). O Poder da Identidade - A Era da Informação: Economia, Sociedade e Cultura (Vol. II). (A. Lemos, & R. Espanha, Trads.) Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments. Journal of Communication, 658-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104

Condesso, F. D. (2007). Direito da Comunicação Social. Coimbra: Almedina.

Dahlberg, L. (1 de Março de 1998). Cyberspace and the Public Sphere: Exploring the Democratic Potential of the Net . Convergence, 4(1), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659800400108

Dahlberg, L. (1 de outubro de 2001). Computer-Mediated Communication and the Public Sphere: a Critical Analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.x

Dahlberg, L. (2004). Net Public Sphere Research: Beyond The First Phase. Javnost - The Public, 11(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2004.11008845

Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’. new media & society, 13(6), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389569

Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, Knowledge and Trust: The Deepening Epistemic Crisis of Democracy. Javnost - The Public, 25(1-2), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819

Ferreira, G. B. (Primavera/Verão de 2010). Internet e Deliberação a Discussão Política em Fóruns Online. Media & Jornalismo, Vol. 9, N.º1(N.º 16), 99-114.

Ferreira, G. B. (2012). Novos media e vida cívica: Estudos sobre deliberação, internet e jornalismo. Covilhã: Livros LabCom, Ubi.

Fishkin, J. (5 de junho de 2013). Making Deliberative Democracy Real. YouTube. Obtido em 27 de setembro de 2020, de https://youtu.be/Hr1MqokjqRQ?t=213

Freelon, D. G. (2010). Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication. new media & society, 12(7), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809357927

Gillmor, D. (2005). Nós, os Media. Barcarena: Editorial Presença.

Gomes, W. (setembro/dezembro de 2005). A democracia digital e o problema da participação civil na decisão política. revista Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos, VII(3), 214-222.

Gonçalves, J. (2018). Aggression in news comments: how context and article topic shape user-generated content. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(5), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1529419

Habermas, J. (1998). «Razonable» versus «verdadero», o la moral de las concepciones. Em J. Habermas, & J. Rawls, Debate sobre el liberalismo político (pp. 145-181). Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.

Masip, P., Ruiz-Caballero, C., & Suau, J. (2019). Audiencias activas y discusión social en la esfera pública digital. Artículo de evisión. El profesional de la información, 28(2).

Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. new media & society, 4(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244

Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. new media & society, 6(2), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444

Quandt, T. (2018). Dark Participation. Media and Communication 6(4), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519

Rawls, J. (2014). A Lei dos Povos e a Ideia de Razão Pública Revisitada. (P. Barcelos, Trad.) Lisboa: Edições 70, Lda.

Rheingold, H. (1996). A Comunidade Virtual. Lisboa: Gradiva.

Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Digital Public Sphere. Em G. e. Mazzoleni, The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (pp. 322-328). London: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087

Schudson, M. (2010). Formas de Cidadania Democrática e Funções do Jornalismo. Cidadania e Jornalismo / Citizenship and Journalism (pp. 23-42). Lisboa: Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento.

Silva, H. T. (4 de maio de 2018). Críticas levam Sócrates a abandonar o PS. JN.pt. Obtido em 25 de setembro de 2020, de https://www.jn.pt/nacional/interior/criticas-levam-socrates-a-abandonar-o-ps-9306472.html

Silva, M. T. (2013). Participação e deliberação: um estudo de caso dos comentários às notícias sobre as eleições presidenciais brasileiras. Comunicação e Sociedade, 23, 82-95.

Springer, N., Engelmann, I., & Pfaffinger, C. (2015). User comments: motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 798–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268

Young, I. M. (abril de 2014). Desafios ativistas à democracia deliberativa. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política(13), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-33522014000100008

Ziegele, M., Mathias, W., Quiring, O., & Breiner, T. (2018). The dynamics of online news discussions: effects of news articles and reader comments on users’ involvement, willingness to participate, and the civility of their contributions. Information, Communication & Society, 21:10,, 21(10), 1419-1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1324505

Ziegele, M., Springer, N., Jost, P., & Wright, S. (2017). Online user comments across news and other content formats: Multidisciplinary perspectives, new directions. Studies in Communication and Media, 6(4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2017-4-315

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Fontes, F. (2020). The Deliberation on Reader Commentary by Portuguese Online Newspaper Readers. Interações: Sociedade E As Novas Modernidades, (39), 136–164. https://doi.org/10.31211/interacoes.n39.2020.a6

Issue

Section

Articles