Youth media repertoires: Age ranges, context factors and privacy management

Autores/as

  • Jeffrey Wimmer University of Augsburg
  • Antonia Wurm University of Augsburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31211/interacoes.n41.2021.a5

Palabras clave:

Apropriación, Juventud, Redes sociales, Repertorio mediático

Resumen

Repertorios mediáticos juveniles: rango de edad, factores contextuales y gestión de la privacidad

El objetivo general del estudio es rastrear la interacción entre la composición del repertorio mediático y el mundo cotidiano de los adolescentes, analizando también la gestión de la privacidad en el transcurso de la adquisición de los medios de comunicación digitales como parte del repertorio mediático. Para hacer justicia a esta complejidad, los jóvenes no fueron considerados como un grupo demográfico uniforme, sino que fueron divididos en tres etapas. A través de esta diferenciación, se va a elaborar un proceso recursivo que permita incluir también factores de influencia contextuales como el grupo de pares, el entorno familiar, etc. y ampliar los hallazgos previos sobre el repertorio mediático de los jóvenes. Como resultado de este enfoque, se elaboró un proceso de desarrollo de múltiples etapas, así como la gestión de la privacidad de los medios de comunicación digital de los jóvenes.

Citas

Choi, H., Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behaviour. Computers in Human Behaviour, 81, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2017.12.001

Crone, E. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2019). Self and others in adolescence. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 447-469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050937

De Wolf, R. (2020). Contextualizing how teens manage personal and interpersonal privacy on social media. New Media & Society, 22 (6), 1058-1075. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444819876570

Ecarius J., Köbel N., & Wahl K. (2011). Was ist Familie? Familie, Erziehung und Sozialisation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Feierabend, S., Plankenhorn, T., & Rathgeb, T. (2016). Social Media im Alltag von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Studies in Communication Sciences, 16 (2), 150-162. doi: 10.1016/j.scoms.2016.10.001

Hasebrink, U., & Domeyer, H. (2012). Media repertoires as patterns of behaviour and as meaningful practices: A multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 9 (2). 757-779.

Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31 (2), 369-387.

Katz, E., Blumler J., G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-32). Sage.

Kim, S. J. (2014). A repertoire approach to cross-platform media use behaviour. New Media & Society. 18 (3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543162.

Krotz, F. (2019). Neue Theorien entwickeln: Eine Einführung in die Grounded Theory, die Heuristische Sozialforschung und die Ethnographie anhand von Beispielen aus der Kommunikationsforschung (2nd ed.). Herbert von Halem Verlag.

Len-Rìos, M. E., Hughes E. H., McKee, G. L., & Young, N. H. (2016). Early adolescents as publics: A national survey of teens with social media accounts, their media use preferences, parental mediation, and perceived Internet literacy. Public Relations Review, 42 (1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.10.003

Linke, C., & Schlote, S. (2018). Medienalltag verstehen: Auswertungsstrategien der Grounded Theory und der Heuristischen Sozialforschung für multi-methodische Analysen der Medienkommunikation in alltäglichen Lebenswelten. In A. M. Scheu (Ed.), Auswertung qualitativer Daten: Strategien, Verfahren und Methoden der Interpretation nicht-standardisierter Daten in der Kommunikations-wissenschaft (pp. 69-81). Springer VS.

Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M., Smith, A., & Beaton, M. (2013). Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved 4/14/21 from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teens-Social- Media-And-Privacy/Summary-of-Findings.aspx

Marwick, E., A., & boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16 (7), 1051-1067. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444814543995

Misoch, S. (2019). Qualitative Interviews (2nd ed.). De Gruyter.

Müller, K., F. (2018). Theoretisches Kodieren von Interviewmaterial. Medienaneignung mit der Grounded Theory induktiv analysieren. In C. Pentzold, A. Bischof & N. Heise (Eds.), Praxis Grounded Theory: Theoriegenerierendes empirisches Forschen in medienbezogenen Lebenswelten (pp.149-169). Springer VS.

Nave-Herz, R. (2002). Die Familie im Wandel. In F. Faulbaum & C. Wolf (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Entwicklungen im Spiegel der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp. 39- 57). Springer Link.

Petronio, S. (2013). Brief status report on communication privacy management theory. Journal of Family Communication, 13 (1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15 267431.2013.743426

Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. University of New York Press.

Rosengren, K. E., Wenner, L. A., & Palmgreen, P. (1985). Media gratifications research: Current perspectives. Sage.

Rothmund, T., Elson, M., Appel, M., Kneer, J., Pfetsch, J., Schneider, F., & Zahn, C. (2015). Macht Gewalt in Unterhaltungsmedien aggressiv? Gehirn und Geist. 10/15, Spektrum. Retrieved 14.04.21 from http://www.spektrum.de/medienge- walt

Ryan, A., M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72 (4), 1135-1150. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00338

Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1979). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Suhrkamp. 121

Smetana, G. J., Campione-Barr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124.

Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of Opportunity: Lessons from the new science on adolescence. Houghton Miflin Harcourt.

Strübing, J. (2014). Grounded Theory. Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundierung eines pragmatischen Forschungsstils (3rd ed.). Springer VS.

Van Der Velden, M., & El Emam, K. (2012). Not all my friends need to know: A qualitative study of teenage patients, privacy, and social media. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20 (1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1136/ami- ajnl-2012-000949

van Kruistum, C. J., Leseman, P. P. M., & de Haan, M. (2014). Youth Media Lifestyles. Human Communication Research, 40 (4), 508–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ hcre.12033

Webster, J. G. (2011). The duality of media: A structurational theory of public atten- tion. Communication Theory 21 (1), 43-66.

Webster, J. G., & Phalen, P. F. (1997). The mass audience: Rediscovering the dominant model. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Wonneberger, A., Schoenbach, K., & van Meurs, L. (2011). Interest in news and politics - or situational determinants? Why people watch the news. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 55(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/088 38151.2011.597466

York, C., & Scholl, R. M. (2015). Youth antecedents to news media consumption: Parent and youth newspaper use, news discussion, and long-term news behavior. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 92 (3), 681-699. https://doi. org/10.1177/1077699015588191

Zillmann, D. (2000). Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 23 (pp. 103-124). Routledge.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-12-31

Cómo citar

Wimmer, J., & Wurm, A. (2021). Youth media repertoires: Age ranges, context factors and privacy management. Interações: Sociedade E As Novas Modernidades, (41), 94–126. https://doi.org/10.31211/interacoes.n41.2021.a5

Número

Sección

Artí­culos