Smart City as Participatory Environment
An Archaeological Exercise on How to Build a Political Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31211/interacoes.n44.2023.a5Keywords:
Smart cities, Media archeology, Functional transformation, Archive, Digital curationAbstract
A certain frenzy is still felt around the idea of what a Smart City is: for some, it is a concern, for others it is an open field of huge possibilities. Stemmed from the ubiquitousness of immersive computing in urban environments, and implemented by the coalescence between several media, a Smart City seems to promise aggregated efficiency among equipment, structures and individuals. On the flip side, a Smart City simultaneously appears to limit citizenship to a series of pre-established, induced or monitored movements, announcing a kind of voluntary surveillance. Inspired by some works, this paper attempts to provide a reflection upon the complex apparatus that a Smart City can be. Making use of an archaeological exercise, it addresses the community and its engagement in placemaking. As a network of people, architectures, tools and programmes a city has always been an informational field and the susceptible environment for commands, therefore of control. A Smart City might not be an invention, but rather the transformation of the old structures with new means and materialities. It is emerging as a result of the diffusion of digital technology in the physical space. Hence the question does not relay on the technology deployed, but rather in the programmatic character of the systems it installs. After all, in technology may lie the way to raise a politically active and sensitive community.
References
Agamben, G. (2009). What is an apparatus? In Kishik, D. and Pedatella, S. (Eds),What is an apparatus? and other essays (pp. 1-23). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Arendt, H. (2005). The Promise of Politics. New York: Schocken Books.
Benjamin, W. (2002) The Arcades Project. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Benjamin, W. (2005). The Author as Producer. In Selected Writings 1931-1934, (2)2, Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Benjamin, W. (1979). To the Planetarium. In One way street and other writings. London: New Left Books, 103-104.
Certeau, M. (1986). L’espace de l’archive ou la perversion du temps, Traverses, 36.
EC - European Commission (n.d.) Smart cities -Cities using technological solutions to improve the management and efficiency of the urban environment. https://commission.europa.eu/eu-regional-and-urban-development/topics/cities-and-urban-development/city-initiatives/smart-cities_en
Flusser, V. (2002). Designing Cities. In Writings (pp. 172-180). Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
Gorgoglione, L., Malinverni, E. S., Smaniotto Costa, C., Pierdicca, R., & Di Stefano, F. (2023). Exploiting 2D/3D Geomatics Data for the Management, Promotion, and Valorization of Underground Built Heritage. Smart Cities, 6, 243-262. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6010012
Gunning, T. (2003). Re-newing Old Technologies: Astonishment, Second Nature and the Uncanny in Technology from the Previous Turn-of-the-Century. In D. Thorburn, & H. Jenkins (Eds.), Rethinking media change: the aesthetics of transition (pp. 39-59). Cambridge: Mit Press.
Kittler, F. (1996). The City is a Medium. New Literary History (27), 717-729.
Leroi-Gourhan, A (1993). Gesture and Speech. Cambridge: Mit Press.
Mumford, L. (1961). The city in History: Its Origins, its transformations and its Prospects. New York: Harcourt.
Parikka, J. (2012). What is media archaeology? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rodriguez, P. (2019). Las Palavras en las Cosas: Saber, Poder y Subjectivatión entre algoritmos y biomoléculas. Buenos Aires: Editorial Cactus.
Simondon, G. (2017). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. London: Univocal.
Smaniotto Costa, C., Šuklje Erjavec, I., Kenna, T., de Lange, M., Ioannidis, K., Maksymiuk, G., de Waal, M. (Eds.) (2019). CyberParks – The Interface Between People, Places and Technology - New Approaches and Perspectives. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13417-4
Smaniotto Costa, C., Volzone, R., Ruchinskaya, T., del Carmen Solano Báez, M.; Menezes, M., Ercan, M.A., & Rollandi, A. (2023). Smart Thinking on Co-Creation and Engagement: Searchlight on Underground Built Heritage. Smart Cities, 6, 392-409. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6010019
Stiegler, B. (2014). Symbolic Misery. The Hyper-Industrial Epoch. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Toomey, A. H., Strehlau-Howay, L., Manzolillo, B., & Thomas, C. (2020). The place-making potential of citizen science: Creating social-ecological connections in an urbanized world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103824
Weber, M. (2005). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
Virilio, P. (2006). Speed and Politics. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Catarina Patrício, Carlos Smaniotto Costa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of published works is retained by the author who grants Interações the original publication right. The published article can be used freely for educational, non-commercial purposes, in accordance with the Creative Commons License - Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International, provided that the author, the title of the article, the title and number of the journal are cited together with the URL or DOI of the article.