Arielism Versus Cosmopolitanism: Brazilian Reaction to 9/11/01 as Cultural Narrative and Identity Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31211/interacoes.40.2021.a4Keywords:
Arielism, Brazil, Identity, Terrorism, Discourse, Digital interactionAbstract
This research examines identity work vis-à-vis Brazilian discourse regarding the events of September 11, 2001. The data is drawn from Brazilian nationals and expatriates participating in a digital discourse forum hosted by the newspaper O Estado de São Paulo. In discussing the events of 9/11/01, Brazilians also make sense of what it means to be Brazilian and what it means to be human. As the data show, Brazilians frame their reactions by drawing on larger understandings of the social world. The two most dominant stances come from Brazilians adopting what can be called Arielist and cosmopolitan stances. In addition, a small group of Brazilian expatriates join the fray as self-proclaimed Americanophiles. In examining these dynamics, we see that identities result from the process of identity construction best framed from a social constructionist perspective. In these three cases, identities emerge from interaction, engagement, and reaction to competing identity frames. Through the ongoing dialogue interactions, Brazilian participants implicitly make statements about their self-conceptions and visions of Brazil’s place in the world during this historic event. Significantly, the complementary and oppositional stances in reaction to 9/11/01 continue to persist almost twenty years after the attacks in the ideological frameworks around national identities circulating in both Brazil and the U.S. at present. In this way, the discourse from 2001 foreshadows the impending political chasm between right and left in both Brazil and the United States and provides an impetus for future research.
References
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology of the second age of modernity. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 79-105.
Beiner, R. (1999). (Ed.). Theorizing Nationalism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2001). Beyond identity. Theory and Society 29, 1-47.
Calhoun, C. (Ed.) (1994). Social theory and the politics of identity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Fine, G. (1993). The sad demise, mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactionism. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 61-87.
Fisher, K. (1997). Locating frames in the discursive universe. Sociological Research Online 2(3), 88-111.
Fominaya, C. F. (2007). Autonomous movements and the institutional left: Two approaches in tension in Madrid’s anti-globalization network. South European Society and Politics 12(3), 335-358.
Fominaya, C. F., & Barberet, R. (2013). Defining the victims of terrorism: Competing frames around victim compensation and commemoration in post-9/11 New York City and 3/11 Madrid. In Athina Karatzogianni (Ed.),Violence and war in culture and the media (pp. 129-146). London: Routledge.
Fominaya, C. F.. (2010). Collective Identity in Social Movements: Central Concepts and Debates. Sociology Compass, 4(6), 393–404.
Fominaya, C. F. (2020). Social movements in a globalized world. London: Red Globe Press.
Fominaya, C. F., & Feenstra, R. A. (2020). Routledge handbook of contemporary european social movements. London: Routledge.
Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J., & Polletta, F. (2000). The return of the repressed: The fall and rise of emotions in social movement theory. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(1), 65-83.
Hall, S. (1996). Who Needs ‘Identity’? In Stuart Hall & Paul du Gay (Eds.),Questions of cultural identity Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Harvey, D.C. (2017). Gimme a pigfoot and a bottle of beer: Food as cultural performance in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. Symbolic Interaction, 40(4), 498-522.
Jenkins, B. (2000). French political culture: homogenous or fragmented? in William Kidd & Sian Reynolds (Eds.), Contemporary French cultural studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kleingeld, P., & Brown, E. (2002). Cosmopolitanism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2002 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/cosmopolitanism/
Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lasmar, J. M. (2020). When the shoe doesn’t fit: Brazilian approaches to terrorism and counterterrorism in the post-9/11 era. In Michael J. Boyle (Ed.), Non-Western responses to terrorism. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
MacDonald, P. K. (2018). America First? Explaining Continuity and Change in Trump’s Foreign Policy. Political Science Quarterly, 133, 402- 434.
McPherson, A. 2003. Yankee No! Anti-Americanism in U.S.-Latin American Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Robinson, L. (2005). Debating the events of September 11th: Discursive and interactional dynamics in three online fora. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 10(4), JCMC10412.
Robinson, L. (2008). The moral accounting of terrorism: Competing interpretations of September 11, 2001. Qualitative Sociology, 31(3), 271-285.
Robinson, L. (2009). Brazilian-US Communication Forum| Cultural Tropes and Discourse: Brazilians, French, and Americans Debate September 11, 2001. International Journal of Communication, 3(16), 652-667.
Robinson, L. (2017). Collective memory: September 11th now and then. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 319-334.
Robinson, L. (2021). Canaries in the climate coal mine: Climate change and COVID-19 as meta-crisis. First Monday.
Ross, A., & Ross, K. (Eds.). (2004). Anti-Americanism. New York: New York University Press.
Stromer-Galley, J., & Martinson, A. (2004, September). Coherence or fragmentation?: Comparing serious and social chat online. Paper presented at the Association for Internet Researchers Annual Conference, Sussex, UK.
Szersynskiand, B., & Urry, J. (2002). Cultures of cosmopolitanism. The Sociological Review, 50(4), 455-481.
Tomlinson, J. (2000). Proximity politics. Information, Communication and Society 3(3), 402-414.
Yúdice, G. (2004). Prepotencia: Latin americans respond. In Andrew Ross & Kristin Ross (Eds.), Anti-Americanism. New York: New York University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Laura Robinson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of published works is retained by the author who grants Interações the original publication right. The published article can be used freely for educational, non-commercial purposes, in accordance with the Creative Commons License - Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International, provided that the author, the title of the article, the title and number of the journal are cited together with the URL or DOI of the article.
